This Weeks' Topic
Coerced Speech

Since 1994, several law schools have been in a standoff with military recruiters regarding their access to the schools’ campuses. A recent Supreme Court decision finally settled the matter, and not in the schools’ favor.

What is compelled speech?

The First Amendment gives us the right to speak freely, but it also gives us the right to remain silent.

In other words, the government cannot compel or coerce you into saying something you don’t want to say

Based on this right, school children can’t be forced to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

If they have any grievance with the words in that pledge, in whole or in part, the government can’t make a law that would force them to say it.

How did the conflict arise between colleges and military recruiters ?

The conflict is over the policy in some college handbooks to not discriminate based on sexual orientation and the military’s policy of "Don't ask , Don't tell".

Several schools forbid discrimination on the grounds of age, race, sex or sexual orientation.

Before allowing the recruiters on campus, the recruiters were asked to sign and agreement that they would not discriminate based on, among other things, sexual orientation.

As a result, many colleges would not allow the military on campus  since they felt the military’s  "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy constituted discrimination.

So how did Congress get involved, and why did this recently end up in front of the Supreme Court.

In 1994, Congress passed the Solomon Act, which said colleges that refused to allow military recruiters on campus would be denied federal funds.

So many colleges let recruiters back on campus but, in many cases,  didn't provide offices or the use of campus office equipment to the recruiters.

Here's where we get back to compelled speech.

Because the Solomon Act severely punished colleges who banned recruiters, they felt that this was, in effect, compelled speech. The schools argued that it was in effect forcing them to say that the school approved of a discriminatory policy.
 
How did the Supreme Court decide?

The final decision was a unanimous 8-0 in favor of the military.

The Court felt that, as harmful as the denial of federal money might be to the colleges, it was an option.

Also, the school's First Amendment rights were not violated because no one was restricting their own speech. Colleges are free to hold protests, hang signs and write editorials that clearly state their opposition to any of the military's policies. 

The Supreme Court's unanimous decision firmly establishes the right of military recruiters to do their jobs on our college campuses.


Disclaimer
This information is general and may or may not apply to your situation. The information contained on this web site is not to be considered as legal advice. Since no two cases are identical, we recommend that you contact an attorney in your jurisdiction to discuss the specific facts of your case. Furthermore, since statutes and case law change so frequently and due to information provided by other sources, we make no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy of the content of this or any other web sites to which we link.


ABOUT AARON | AARON SACHS LAW FIRM | KODE NEWS ROOM | KSPR NEWS ROOM
ARCHIVED SEGMENTS
| TOPIC IDEAS | CONTACT US | HOME | BULLETIN
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2006 Aaron Sachs. All Rights Reserved
Web Site Design by Blue Onion