This Weeks' Topic
Miranda Rights

Why do police officers have to read a suspect his or her rights when they are placed under arrest?

Anyone who’s ever watched a TV police show knows the phrase, “You have the right to remain silent.” Chief Justice William Rehnquist once said that “the warnings have become part of our national culture.” In fact, the reading of a suspect’s Miranda Rights has become so commonplace that it is easy to forget why we have those rights.

Miranda Rights. We have heard them on TV police shows all the time:

  • You have the right to remain silent.
  • Anything you say to police officers may be used as evidence against you in a court of law.
  • You have the right to obtain an attorney.
  • If you can’t afford an attorney, the court will provide one for you.

Why are they known as Miranda Rights?

The name stems from a 1963 case in which a man named Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Arizona.

The police failed to tell him that he had the right to an attorney during interrogation, or that he could refuse to answer their  questions.

As a result, he was later convicted because he confessed to robbery, kidnapping and rape.

Three years later, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the conviction because Miranda did not know his rights.
What rights are being protected here?

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that no person shall "be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself."

The right against self-incrimination is so important that the Supreme Court requires officers to remind suspects of those rights.

Now, it is interesting to note, that Miranda’s case we retried: the evidence of his confession was excluded, and he was still convicted.

Do the rights have to be read before an arrest can be made?

No. The rights refer to interrogation by police. A suspect can be arrested and detained without having his or her rights read.

Officers can also ask your name, address, and date of birth without reading rights, and a drunk driving suspect does not have to be read the Miranda Rights prior to taking a breathalyzer test.

But the police must read the Miranda Rights before they can question the suspect.

Recently, a Missouri Miranda case went before the U.S. Supreme Court. What was that case about?

A Missouri woman was suspected of arson. A detective questioned her and obtained a confession without reading her rights.

After she confessed, he finally read her rights to her, and got her to repeat the confession.
The Supreme Court ruled that this tactic would allow police departments to sidestep Miranda Rights by getting information first, then reading the rights . . . so her conviction was overturned.

Miranda Rights ensure that we all receive the full protection of the Fifth Amendment.


Disclaimer
This information is general and may or may not apply to your situation. The information contained on this web site is not to be considered as legal advice. Since no two cases are identical, we recommend that you contact an attorney in your jurisdiction to discuss the specific facts of your case. Furthermore, since statutes and case law change so frequently and due to information provided by other sources, we make no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy of the content of this or any other web sites to which we link.


ABOUT AARON | AARON SACHS LAW FIRM | KODE NEWS ROOM | KSPR NEWS ROOM
ARCHIVED SEGMENTS
| TOPIC IDEAS | CONTACT US | HOME | BULLETIN
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2006 Aaron Sachs. All Rights Reserved
Web Site Design by Blue Onion