Why were Missouri’s
executions by lethal injection put on hold in 2006?
- Michael Taylor challenged Missouri’s method of the death penalty
by lethal injection.
- Michael Taylor had been sentenced to death for the rape and murder
of a 15-year-old girl.
- He claimed that Missouri’s lethal injection executions caused
great pain to criminals, which was an unconstitutional form of cruel
and unusual punishment.
What about death by lethal injection is considered “cruel
and unusual” ?
Missouri uses three chemicals:
- The first is an anesthetic.
- The second paralyzes the entire body.
- The third causes a heart attack.
- In his ruling, the lower federal court judge found problems with
the procedure.
- In other words, if the anesthetic isn’t administered properly,
the last drug can cause excruciating pain – it is a chemically
induced heart attack.
What was the 8th Circuit Court’s decision?
- On appeal, an 8th Circuit affirmed that Missouri’s
lethal injection protocol does not violate the Constitution, Taylor ‘s
attorneys plan on appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Until a higher court in the land rules differently,
- Missouri’s current method of administering lethal injections
is constitutional.
Disclaimer
This information is general and may or may not apply to your situation.
The information contained on this web site is not to be considered as
legal advice. Since no two cases are identical, we recommend that you
contact an attorney in your jurisdiction to discuss the specific facts
of your case. Furthermore, since statutes and case law change so frequently
and due to information provided by other sources, we make no warranty
or guarantee concerning the accuracy of the content of this or any other
web sites to which we link.
|
