This Weeks' Topic
Right to Die

Right-to-die laws.  How did the right-to-die movement begin?

The right-to-die movement is rooted in tragic cases like the recent Terry Schiavo situation, in which someone was being kept alive only by life support.

One of the earliest and most famous cases is actually from Missouri – the Nancy Cruzan case, which also went before the Supreme Court, the result is a general awareness of the importance of living wills.

The right of terminally ill people to determine their own time and means of death stems from the same philosophy.

Can terminally ill patients legally request a lethal overdose from their doctor? And if so, how does it work?

Yes, in the state of Oregon.  The Supreme Court in January upheld Oregon’s right to die law.  Two doctors must first determine that the patient’s condition  is terminal, and  irreversible, and that the patient is of sound mind. At that point, the doctors can prescribe a lethal overdose.

 So far 208 patients have passed on after exercising their legal rights under the law; 80 were suffering from cancer.

How did it become a law?

In 1994, Oregon voters enacted the Oregon Death with Dignity Act  by a narrow margin of 51 percent to 49 percent.

Due to court battles, the Act did not go into law until 1997.

In that same year, people opposed to the law got it on the ballot again, hoping it would be rescinded.  But to everyone’s surprise it passed by 60 to 40 percent.


How did this law end up before the U.S. Supreme Court?

The attorney general at the time, John Ashcroft, challenged the law, saying that the federal Controlled Substances Act allowed him to prosecute doctors who aided terminally ill patients in committing suicide.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law. The new attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, then appealed again, sending the case to the Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court voted 6-3  to uphold the Oregon law, and actually it was decided as a state’s rights versus federal rights matter.

The court said that the attorney general did not have the authority to override a state law.

The right to die is clearly a matter to be decided by a state. The basis for this case, may well be used for other controversial matters such as pending anti abortion laws.


Disclaimer
This information is general and may or may not apply to your situation. The information contained on this web site is not to be considered as legal advice. Since no two cases are identical, we recommend that you contact an attorney in your jurisdiction to discuss the specific facts of your case. Furthermore, since statutes and case law change so frequently and due to information provided by other sources, we make no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy of the content of this or any other web sites to which we link.


ABOUT AARON | AARON SACHS LAW FIRM | KODE NEWS ROOM | KSPR NEWS ROOM
ARCHIVED SEGMENTS
| TOPIC IDEAS | CONTACT US | HOME | BULLETIN
 
 
Copyright © 2001-2006 Aaron Sachs. All Rights Reserved
Web Site Design by Blue Onion